I stopped in at the Madison Public Library, a former employer, in order to say hi to some people I used to work with. None were there at the time, so I went over to the cookbook section to have a look around. There, I got into a one-sided conversation with a gentleman looking for a book on hydroponics.
Man: Do you know where the hydroponic books are?
Me: Um, sorry–no, I don’t really know.
Man: I can’t find anything–it’s all these computers screwing up the numbers. If I ever find out who’s responsible for this new computerized system, I’ll slit his throat.
*tvol walks away slowly*
Today at the Michigan Union, copyright specialists Jessica Litman and Jack Bernard gave a talk entitled “Risks, Rights, and Responsibilities: Current Copyright Issues for Academics.” The talk was very interesting, and demonstrated the university and library commitment towards working to educate faculty about copyright. While university-level educators continue to sign restrictive licensing agreements with publishers, it’s important to support faculty in their aims to retain important intellectual rights.
At large research universities, tenure-track faculty are continually under the gun to publish, publish, publish. While there are increasingly more open access platforms to communicate research and scholarly articles, we still have a long way to go to in reducing the lock-in that traditional publishing gatekeepers have over the process. We want to continue to encourage faculty to publish, and it’s in the best interest of faculty and the university to support this. At the same time, we want to support the ever-growing community of scholars and teachers who see the benefits of opening up their work with the world–not keeping it locked within a publishing framework where content is resold to universities at extraordinary cost.
Perhaps department heads, tenure review boards, and the administration as a whole needs to review this peculiar incentive structure and begin to embrace new, more open modes of evaluation that can jump out of this deep, harmful publishing rut. Perhaps universities, especially public universities, need to leverage their political power with taxpayers in re-analyzing the logic behind paying once for research and then paying again for access to that same research.
“We’re sorry, your library’s copies of this eContent are currently in use. Either try again later or use one of the options below.”
My information policy class at the School of Information provides students with many free resources online, including access to some books and articles which the university has subscribed to. Students must enter their uniquename and password, and then are able to view the electronic resources. Or so I thought. Looks like the service is just about as useful as providing one physical copy on reserve at the old library.
